This year was full of new entries, most of which were the high-end flagships by different brands. Here today, we have picked up two such devices from Oppo and Motorola and you can see the comparison between Reno 7 Pro 5G and Moto G200 5G on this page. Without further ado, let’s begin!
Must see:Â Best Android smartphones under $400
First, we will catch up with the common grounds of Reno 7 Pro 5G and Moto G200 5G, later followed by the differences. Thereafter, you can make the best choice for yourself!
Similarities
- Android 11 operating system pre-installed
- Common storage variant of 256GB paired with 8GB RAM
- Connectivity options include dual-band Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 5.2, and GPS with A-GPS
- Sensors stand the same with an accelerometer, gyro, proximity, and compass
As you might have noticed, there aren’t many factors of the two devices that we can consider homogenous. So here we have crafted the difference between them in a tabular form to make it easier for you.
Reno 7 Pro 5G vs Moto G200 5G
| Category | Reno 7 Pro 5G | Moto G200 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 6.55 inches AMOLED HDR10+ 90Hz refresh rate 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution Corning Gorilla Glass 5 protection | 6.8 inches LCD HDR10 144Hz, refresh rate 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution |
| Processor | Octa-core CPU Dimensity 1200 Max 5G SoC ARM G77 MC9 GPU | Octa-core CPU Snapdragon 888+ 5GSoC Adreno 660 GPU |
| Storage Configuration | 256GB 8GB RAM 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | 50 MP wide 8MP ultrawide 2 MP macro | 108 MP wide 8MP ultrawide 2 MP depth |
| Front Camera | 32 MP wide | 16 MP wide |
| Battery Capacity | 4500 mAh 65W Fast charging Reverse charging | 5000 mAh 33W Fast charging |
| Connectivity | GPS with A-GPS. Up to dual-band: GLONASS (1), BDS (2), GALILEO (2), QZSS (2), NavIC | GPS with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Sensors | under display, optical Fingerprint reader | side-mounted Fingerprint reader |
| Dimensions | 158.2 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm | 168.1 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm |
| Weight | 180 g | 202 g |
